1/12. A study on severe food reactions in sweden--is soy protein an underestimated cause of food anaphylaxis?BACKGROUND AND methods: Because of a fatal case of soy anaphylaxis occurring in sweden in 1992, a study was started the following year in which all physicians were asked to report fatal and life-threatening reactions caused by food. The results of the first 3 years of the study are reported here, including results from another ongoing study on deaths from asthma during the same period. RESULTS: In 1993-6, 61 cases of severe reactions to food were reported, five of them fatal. Peanut, soy, and tree nuts seemed to have caused 45 of the 61 reactions, and four of them were fatal. If two cases occurring less than a year before our study started are included, we are aware of two deaths caused by peanuts and four deaths caused by soy. All four youngsters who died from soy anaphylaxis with asthma were severely allergic to peanuts but had no previously known allergy to soy. In most cases, there was a rather symptom-free period for 30-90 min between early mild symptoms and severe and rapidly deteriorating asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Soy has probably been underestimated as a cause of food anaphylaxis. Those at risk seem to be young people with asthma and peanut allergy so severe that they notice symptoms after indirect contact.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 1keywords = peanut (Clic here for more details about this article) |
2/12. Anaphylactic reaction to young garlic.BACKGROUND: garlic is well known to cause contact dermatitis and asthma. However, it is a very rare cause of food allergy. We present the case of a 23-year-old woman with previous history of allergy to pollen and dried fruit, and food-dependent, exercise-induced anaphylaxis for which no specific food could be identified as responsible, who experienced an anaphylactic reaction after eating young garlic. methods: Skin prick tests and specific IgE immunoassay with several pollens and foods were performed, as well as the prick-prick test with young garlic and SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting IgE to young garlic and other liliaceae species, mustard, sesame, parsley, celery, hazelnut, almond, and pollen of birch and mugwort. RESULTS: Skin prick tests and specific IgE were mainly positive for grass, plane tree, and mugwort pollen; peanut; hazelnut; walnut; almond; and mustard. Prick-prick tests with young garlic and garlic were positive. Total IgE was 113 U/ml. SDS-PAGE immunoblotting showed IgE-binding bands at 12 kDa to young garlic, garlic, onion, and leek extracts. Similar bands could also be detected with mugwort pollen and hazelnut extract. CONCLUSIONS: We describe IgE-mediated reaction to young garlic in a patient sensitized to pollen and dried fruit.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.33333333333333keywords = peanut (Clic here for more details about this article) |
3/12. Lupine-induced anaphylaxis.BACKGROUND: Legumes are one of the most common foods causing allergic reactions in children and adults. Cross-reacting antibodies are frequently demonstrated in this family but the real clinical cross-reactivity is uncommon. OBJECTIVE: To report a case of lupine-induced anaphylaxis and to elucidate in vivo and in vitro cross-reactivity with some legumes. methods: Skin prick test (SPT) with some legumes were performed. Cap-IgE, ELISA-IgE, and immunoblotting were carried out. Open oral challenges with some legumes were performed. Cross-reactivity was studied by ELISA and immunoblotting inhibition. RESULTS: The results demonstrated type-I hypersensitivity reactions with lupine and some other legumes. Cap-IgE with peanut was positive but the SPT and ELISA-IgE were negative and the patient tolerated a peanut challenge. ELISA inhibition revealed a partial inhibition (62%) using lupine as the solid phase. Partial inhibition was demonstrated by immunoblotting inhibition. Open oral challenge with peanut and green bean were negative but positive with pea. CONCLUSION: We present a lupine sensitized patient with positive SPT and in vitro cross-reactivity with other legumes. Clinical cross-reactivity progressively developed over a 5-year period. Discrepancies were found between the clinical aspect and in vitro study of peanut allergy. Factors determining the wide variability in cross-reactivity among individuals are still obscure.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 1.3333333333333keywords = peanut (Clic here for more details about this article) |
4/12. Lethal or life-threatening allergic reactions to food.Fatal or life-threatening anaphylactic reactions to food occur in infants, children and adults. Atopic individuals with bronchial asthma and prior allergic reactions to the same food are at a particularly high risk, whereby even the mere inhalation of the allergenic food can be fatal. Not only peanuts, seafood and milk can induce severe, potentially lethal anaphylaxis, but indeed a wide spectrum of foods, according to the different patterns of food sensitivity in different countries. Foods with "hidden" allergens and meals at restaurants are particularly dangerous for patients with food allergies. Similarly, schools, public places and restaurants are the major places of risk. However, the main factor contributing to a fatal outcome is the fact that the victims did not carry their emergency kit with adrenaline (epinephrine) with them. In cases of death where food anaphylaxis is suspected, it is important for forensic reasons to preserve uneaten portions of the food in order to identify (hidden) allergens. It is also important to determine postmortem specific serum IgE, tryptase and histamine levels to document the anaphylaxis. There is a need to raise awareness of the diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis among doctors, those called upon to administer emergency medical care, and the public, and also to provide increased support for those with potentially fatal food allergies through the help of patients' organizations, and national and international medical societies. The food industry should ensure a policy of comprehensive labelling of ingredients so that even the smallest amount of potentially lethal foodstuffs can be clearly identified. Finally, the pharmaceutical industry should be persuaded to reintroduce an adrenaline inhaler onto the market.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.33333333333333keywords = peanut (Clic here for more details about this article) |
5/12. Passive transfer of nut allergy after liver transplantation.An anaphylactic reaction to cashew nut developed in a nonatopic 60-year-old man 25 days after receiving a liver allograft from a 15-year-old atopic boy who died of anaphylaxis after peanut ingestion. The liver recipient had no history of nut allergy. Posttransplantation skin prick test results were positive for peanut, cashew nut, and sesame seed, and the donor had allergen-specific IgE antibodies to the same 3 allergens. contact tracing of the recipients of other solid organs from the same donor disclosed no other development of allergic symptoms after ingestion of peanut or cashew nut. Results of molecular HLA typing did not detect any donor-origin leukocytes in the recipient after transplantation, which excluded peripheral microchimerism. The patient inadvertently ingested peanut-contaminated food and suffered a second anaphylactic reaction 32 weeks after the transplantation. This case illustrates that transfer of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity can occur after liver transplantation and have potentially serious consequences. We therefore recommend that organ donors undergo screening for allergies, and that recipients be advised regarding allergen avoidance.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 1.3333333333333keywords = peanut (Clic here for more details about this article) |
6/12. Possible anaphylaxis after propofol in a child with food allergy.OBJECTIVE: To report a case of anaphylaxis due to propofol in a child with allergies to egg and peanut oil. CASE SUMMARY: A 14-month-old boy with a history of reactive airway disease was hospitalized for treatment of respiratory symptoms. The patient had documented allergies to egg, peanut oil, and mold. Within the first few hours after admission, acute respiratory decompensation occurred, and arrangements were made to transfer the patient to our tertiary-care hospital. Prior to transfer, he was emergently intubated under sedation and paralysis with propofol and rocuronium. When emergency air transport arrived, the patient was hypotensive and tachycardic. His symptoms of anaphylaxis were managed throughout the flight and, upon arrival at our institution, the patient was admitted to the Pediatric intensive care Unit. He improved over a 5-day hospital course, and his caregivers were instructed to avoid propofol in the future. The patient's anaphylactic reaction following propofol was rated as a possible adverse drug reaction using the Naranjo probability scale. DISCUSSION: The use of propofol in pediatric patients for procedural sedation has gained increased favor. Since the propofol formulation contains both egg lecithin and soybean oil, its use is contraindicated in patients with hypersensitivities to these components. Several other drugs have a food component, resulting in contraindications and warnings in product labeling. CONCLUSIONS: propofol should be avoided in patients with allergies to egg and/or soybean oil, if possible. Clinicians should consider the potential for adverse drug events in patients with select food allergies.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.66666666666667keywords = peanut (Clic here for more details about this article) |
7/12. Immunologic and clinical responses to parenteral immunotherapy in peanut anaphylaxis--a study using IgE and IgG4 immunoblot monitoring.BACKGROUND: Specific desensitisation to food allergens, which produce anaphylaxis after ingestion, has not been considered as a treatment for food allergy until recently. The purpose of this study was to assess if a parenteral immunotherapy program, using a partially characterised crude peanut extract, could induce a state of immunological tolerance in a patient who exhibited anaphylaxis, asthma and urticaria on exposure to peanut and other legumes. A further aim was to measure the serum antibody responses to the immunotherapy. methods AND RESULTS: We report the successful desensitisation towards all of the legumes tested of a male patient on parenteral immunotherapy using a partially characterised peanut extract. The immunologic parameters measured during treatment included specific IgE and IgG4 for peanut, soybean, pea and lentil extracts. Immunoblots of specific IgE and IgG4 were made before and after therapy. The antibody response followed the same pattern seen in successful desensitisation of patients with bee venom anaphylaxis. The IgG4 levels increased strongly from a low pre-treatment level in proportion to the antigen dose received. The antigen-specific IgE levels gradually fell from a high pretreatment level, but remained significantly elevated. immunoblotting for specific IgE and IgG4 demonstrated that acquisition of clinical tolerance after therapy was associated with declines in the number and intensity of bands in IgE blots and the development of more bands of increasing density in the IgG4 blots. CONCLUSIONS: Parenteral immunotherapy may offer an alternative treatment to lifelong dietary restriction and epinephrine injections in patients who exhibit life-threatening IgE-mediated anaphylaxis to peanut. Cross desensitisation to other legumes appears to have occurred in this study. The quality and potency of the extract used is an important factor in achieving the desired acquisition of clinical tolerance. In our patient this tolerance correlated with his ability to maintain high levels of specific IgG4, which acted as a marker of protection against anaphylaxis. The use of IgG4 immunoblotting may provide an improved level of discrimination in the assessment of correlation of clinical efficacy with the immunologic response.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 3keywords = peanut (Clic here for more details about this article) |
8/12. Fatal anaphylactic reactions induced by peanuts.Peanuts are a common cause of food allergy, but they have infrequently been documented as causing fatal anaphylactic reactions. We review five previously reported fatalities caused by peanut allergy, along with data on IgE binding proteins in extracts of a commercial product containing peanuts that have been deflavored and reflavored and colored to resemble walnuts, pecans, or almonds. Ingestion of this product may pose hazards to peanut-sensitive persons. Finally, we identify several factors that may contribute to the severity and possible lethality of food-induced anaphylaxis.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 2.3333333333333keywords = peanut (Clic here for more details about this article) |
9/12. Fatal nut anaphylaxis in a 16-year-old male: case report.A case of fatal nut anaphylaxis in a 16-year-old atopic, steroid-dependent asthmatic male is reviewed. He had large positive skin tests (scratch) to walnuts and peanuts. serum was positive for specific IgE antibody measured by solid-phase radioimmunoassay to pecans. The importance of the immediate use of epinephrine is emphasized. Accidental ingestion of foods to which patients are sensitive is a common error for which patients must be prepared with preloaded epinephrine syringes.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.33333333333333keywords = peanut (Clic here for more details about this article) |
10/12. Fatal food-induced anaphylaxis.Fatal food-induced anaphylaxis is rarely reported. In 16 months, we identified seven such cases involving five males and two females, aged 11 to 43 years. All victims were atopic with multiple prior anaphylactic episodes after ingestion of the incriminated food (peanut, four; pecan, one; crab, one; fish, one). In six cases the allergenic food was ingested away from home. Factors contributing to the severity of individual reactions included denial of symptoms, concomitant intake of alcohol, reliance on oral antihistamines alone to treat symptoms, and adrenal suppression by chronic glucocorticoid therapy for coexisting asthma. In no case was epinephrine administered immediately after onset of symptoms. Premortem or postmortem serum samples were available from six victims; in each case elevated levels of IgE antibodies to the incriminated food were demonstrated. Food-sensitive individuals must self-administer epinephrine promptly at the first sign of systemic reaction. Emergency care providers should be aware of cricothyrotomy as a life-saving procedure.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.33333333333333keywords = peanut (Clic here for more details about this article) |
| | Next -> |