1/86. Perianal contact dermatitis caused by nail lacquer allergy.BACKGROUND: Allergy to nail cosmetics is relatively infrequent compared with other cosmetics. Allergic contact dermatitis from nail lacquer typically affects the eyelids, cheeks, sides of the neck, hands and periungual areas, and less frequently another areas. OBJECTIVE: We report on a patient who developed nail lacquer-related allergic contact dermatitis in an infrequent location, namely the perianal area. methods: A patient with perianal and eyelid pruritus and dermatitis was patch tested with the TRUE tests, cosmetic series, personal cosmetics, plastic and glue series, and personal nail lacquers. RESULTS: A 2 positive allergic response was observed at the sites of the toluenesulfonamide-formaldehyde resin and at the sites the patient's nail lacquers at days 2 and 4. CONCLUSION: Nail lacquer allergy may be observed at distant sites, and the perianal area may be involved more frequently than was previously thought.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 1keywords = allergy (Clic here for more details about this article) |
2/86. Disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis like drug eruption: a case report.We report a 54-year-old male patient who developed an unusual form of generalized drug eruption. He had pain and breathlessness on the left chest wall. He had history of taking several drugs at private clinics under a diagnosis of herpes zoster. Two weeks later he had a generalized skin eruption. Examination showed multiple variable sized, mild pruritic, erythematous macules and papules on the face and upper extremities. skin lesions take the form of a clinically consistent with disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis (DSAP). methylprednisolone 16 mg, astemisole 10 mg, oxatomide 60 mg was prescribed. Topical corticosteroid cream was applied. Within two months, his eruption had cleared almost completely. The pathogenetic mechanisms of this case are unclear, but drug and UV light have been considered.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.037133257773422keywords = drug (Clic here for more details about this article) |
3/86. Late-type allergy to the X-ray contrast medium Solutrast (iopamidol).In the past few years, there have been an increasing number of publications on delayed intolerance reactions, including rashes, following the use of X-ray contrast media. We report a patient in whom infiltrated erythema of the face and generalized maculopapular rashes occurred on 2 occasions, within 1 day, following the use of the X-ray contrast medium Solutrast (iopamidol) for coronary angiography. The allergological investigations for clarification included prick tests and patch tests using a series of contrast media, as well as individual intravenous provocation tests. We found the cause to be a late-type allergy to the active substance iopamidol contained in the contrast medium Solutrast. We found a concomitant cross-reactivity to the contrast media iopromid and iomeprol. All 3 contrast media represent the monomeric, non-ionic type.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 1keywords = allergy (Clic here for more details about this article) |
4/86. Occupational protein contact dermatitis to cornstarch in a paper adhesive.BACKGROUND: Protein contact dermatitis is better known in food-service and health-care workers than in industrial workers. Cornstarch has seldom been a problem, although it can cause contact urticaria to glove powder. OBJECTIVE: To present the case of a paper-bag maker who developed severe occupational (protein) contact dermatitis within two-three hours after returning to work. She lacked any evidence of urticaria and demonstrated largely negative patch-test results. methods: Following a history of occupational exposure to a cornstarch-based adhesive, the patient was patch-tested to materials with which she had worked, which she contacted, and with which she had attempted treatment. Following patch testing, she was prick-tested to cornstarch, the principal ingredient in the adhesive. RESULTS: Patch testing was negative except for a very mild reaction to the adhesive. Prick testing to cornstarch was more severe than the histamine control. The test site became eczematous and remained so for more than ten weeks. Avoidance of cornstarch and the adhesive was followed by clearing. CONCLUSION: Workup for prominent occupational contact dermatitis without urticaria may sometimes require testing for type 1 allergy.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.2keywords = allergy (Clic here for more details about this article) |
5/86. Laboratory assistant's occupational allergic airborne contact dermatitis from nickel presenting as rosacea.A male laboratory assistant working in a metallurgical laboratory with airborne exposure to nickel dust developed highly pruritic, rosacea-like symptoms. The symptoms cleared within eight days without treatment when the patient was off work. Patch testing confirmed nickel allergy. Based on the patient's work and clinical history it was evident that occupational exposure to airborne nickel induced the highly abnormal rosacea-like symptoms, not previously reported from nickel.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.2keywords = allergy (Clic here for more details about this article) |
6/86. Dermatological adverse effects with the antimalarial drug mefloquine: a review of 74 published case reports.mefloquine is a relatively new antimalarial drug which has been associated with a wide variety of adverse effects, including skin reactions. In order to evaluate the range and frequency of mefloquine's dermatological effects, we searched the scientific literature for published case reports of such effects. We found 74 case reports, published between the years 1983 and 1997. pruritus and maculopapular rash are the dermatological effects most commonly associated with mefloquine: their approximate frequency is 4-10% for pruritus, and up to 30% for nonspecific maculopapular rash. Adverse effects associated less commonly with mefloquine include urticaria, facial lesions and cutaneous vasculitis. One case of stevens-johnson syndrome and one fatal case of toxic epidermal necrolysis occurred. Appropriate primary studies of mefloquine use should be carried out to elucidate the epidemiology and aetiology of dermatological and other adverse effects of the drug.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.031828506662933keywords = drug (Clic here for more details about this article) |
7/86. Photosensitivity to lomefloxacin. A clinical and photobiological study.Photosensitivity is an uncommon but characteristic side effect of quinolones, with a variable incidence for the different drugs. Several cases, considered either phototoxic or photoallergic, have been described with lomefloxacin use. During the last 4 years we studied 8 patients (mean age 69.4 years) with eczematous or acute sunburn-like lesions in photo-exposed areas, after taking lomefloxacin for a period of one week to several months. After drug withdrawal and systemic and/or topical corticosteroids, lesions cleared within one week to two months, with dischromia in one patient. Six to eight weeks thereafter, a photobiological study was performed. Minimal erythema dose (MED) for UVA and UVB were normal and photopatch tests with lomefloxacin, ofloxacin, ciproflaxacin and norfloxacin, tested at 1%, 5% and 10% in petrolatum and irradiated with 5 and 10 J/cm2 UVA were negative in 7 patients and 20 controls. Patient 1 had a positive photopatch test with lomefloxacin. One patient, who inadvertently reintroduced the drug before photopatch testing, developed a sharply limited erythematous reaction at 48 h in all irradiated areas, without aggravation at the sites of the quinolones patches. Our patients illustrate the polymorphism of clinical photosensitivity to lomefloxacin and represent the largest series in which photobiological studies have been performed. As in previous reports there are arguments favouring photoallergy, but phototoxicity appears to be the main mechanism of photosensitivity to quinolones, particularly in older patients with concomitant diseases and long-term use of the drug.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.22121900444196keywords = allergy, drug (Clic here for more details about this article) |
8/86. Localized pustulosis induced by betalactams.Localized forms of pustular drug eruptions related to antibiotics are uncommon and their mechanism is still unknown. We describe herein a patient who developed numerous pin-head pustules without erythema in the peribuccal area after ingestion of ceftibuten and amoxicillin. The relationship with these drugs was confirmed by single-blind oral challenges. The following tests were performed: prick and intradermal tests with benzylpenicilloyl polylysine, minor determinant mixture, benzylpenicillin and amoxicillin; patch tests were also carried out with benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin, cloxacillin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, cefazolin, ceftibuten and cefaclor. All cutaneous tests were negative. Controlled single-blind challenge tests were performed with amoxicillin, cefadroxil, ceftibuten, cefuroxime, cefaclor, erythromycin and ciprofloxacin. All betalactam antibiotics tested gave a positive reaction, with good tolerance of other antibiotics; this would appear to indicate a specific mechanism of hypersensitivity and not an unspecific reaction to wide spectrum antibiotics.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.010609502220978keywords = drug (Clic here for more details about this article) |
9/86. Milia en plaque: a new site.A 35-year-old Kuwaiti field worker presented with a history of an asymptomatic, erythematous plaque on the right side of the nasal bridge. It soon extended to the malar area, being studded with multiple yellowish papules (Fig. 1). He denied any history of photosensitivity, drug intake, local trauma, topical applications, or ionizing radiations to that area. Examination revealed an erythematous, 1.5 x 3 cm plaque on the right nasal fold, extending to the malar area, overlain by a group of tiny yellowish papules (15-20 in number). He also had a few discrete milia on the right cheek. The histology (Fig. 2) revealed multiple keratin-filled cysts, surrounded by a dense lymphocytic infiltrate, findings consistent with milia; 0.05% tretinoin was prescribed twice daily for 1 month without improvement; minocycline, 100 mg daily, was then employed, and at 1 month of follow-up there was a significant decrease in erythema and milia count.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.0053047511104889keywords = drug (Clic here for more details about this article) |
10/86. Idiopathic eruptive macular pigmentation: report of 10 cases.Idiopathic eruptive macular pigmentation (IEMP) is a rare disease. IEMP is characterized by asymptomatic, pigmented macules involving the neck, trunk, and proximal extremities. This study describes 10 cases of idiopathic eruptive macular pigmentation seen during a 9-year period at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, korea. We present these characteristic consecutive cases to provide more insight into the clinical picture and course of IEMP. skin lesions of 8 patients were multiple brown macules involving the trunk, face, neck, and extremities. In 2 patients, multiple dark brown macules and patches were noted. The age of onset varied from 1 to 20 years. Tentative diagnoses were usually ashy dermatosis (erythema dyschromicum perstans), fixed drug eruption, or mastocytosis. The history of any erythema and drug medication was absent. Darier's sign was absent. skin biopsy specimens showed increased pigmentation of the basal layer in an otherwise normal epidermis. Pigmentary incontinence, melanophages, and mild perivascular lymphohistiocytic infiltrate in the papillary dermis were also revealed. mast cells could not be found. The lesions gradually disappeared during a period of several months to years. The alleged rarity of IEMP may be partially caused by medical unfamiliarity with this entity, despite its clinical and histopathologic characteristic picture. Treatment of IEMP is unnecessary because spontaneous resolution of the lesions can be expected within several months to a few years.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.010609502220978keywords = drug (Clic here for more details about this article) |
| | Next -> |