Cases reported "Food Hypersensitivity"

Filter by keywords:



Filtering documents. Please wait...

1/22. Anaphylactic reaction to young garlic.

    BACKGROUND: garlic is well known to cause contact dermatitis and asthma. However, it is a very rare cause of food allergy. We present the case of a 23-year-old woman with previous history of allergy to pollen and dried fruit, and food-dependent, exercise-induced anaphylaxis for which no specific food could be identified as responsible, who experienced an anaphylactic reaction after eating young garlic. methods: Skin prick tests and specific IgE immunoassay with several pollens and foods were performed, as well as the prick-prick test with young garlic and SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting IgE to young garlic and other liliaceae species, mustard, sesame, parsley, celery, hazelnut, almond, and pollen of birch and mugwort. RESULTS: Skin prick tests and specific IgE were mainly positive for grass, plane tree, and mugwort pollen; peanut; hazelnut; walnut; almond; and mustard. Prick-prick tests with young garlic and garlic were positive. Total IgE was 113 U/ml. SDS-PAGE immunoblotting showed IgE-binding bands at 12 kDa to young garlic, garlic, onion, and leek extracts. Similar bands could also be detected with mugwort pollen and hazelnut extract. CONCLUSIONS: We describe IgE-mediated reaction to young garlic in a patient sensitized to pollen and dried fruit.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 1
keywords = grass
(Clic here for more details about this article)

2/22. Fennel, cucumber, and melon allergy successfully treated with pollen-specific injection immunotherapy.

    BACKGROUND: In subjects with both pollinosis and vegetable food allergy, most allergenic epitopes of fruits and vegetables are present in pollen. A recent study showed a marked reduction or a total disappearance of apple-induced oral allergy syndrome in patients receiving injection immunotherapy with birch pollen extracts. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether vegetable food allergy following other kinds of primary pollinosis may be successfully treated with pollen-specific immunotherapy. methods: A 34-year-old woman with long-standing pollinosis and typical oral allergy syndrome (OAS) with the ingestion of both fennel and cucumber and whose OAS was associated with immediate laryngeal edema after the ingestion of melon, was treated with two commercial depot aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed extracts of 1 grass pollen and 2 mugwort pollen 50% ragweed pollen 50%. RESULTS: After 36 months of injection specific immunotherapy, the patient was able to tolerate both fresh fennel and cucumber without consequence on open oral challenge tests. After 43 months of immunotherapy, the patient tolerated fresh melon as well on open oral challenge. She has re-introduced these vegetables in her normal diet. skin tests showed no reactivity to fresh fennel and there was a reduction of the wheal induced by fresh cucumber. CONCLUSION: Vegetable food allergy following primary sensitization to pollens, other than birch, may also be effectively reduced by pollen-specific injection immunotherapy.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 1
keywords = grass
(Clic here for more details about this article)

3/22. Bee pollen-induced anaphylactic reaction in an unknowingly sensitized subject.

    BACKGROUND: The food supplement bee pollen has been previously found to cause anaphylactic reactions. It has been proposed as useful for "everything from bronchitis to hemorrhoids." OBJECTIVE: This study describes an atopic patient who experienced a non-life-threatening anaphylactic reaction upon her initial ingestion of bee pollen. Microscopic examination of the pollen sample and ELISA inhibition assays were performed. RESULTS: The patient had a 7 mm/28 mm wheal/erythema reaction to bee pollen at 1 mg/mL concentration. Bee pollen caused 52% inhibition of IgE binding to short ragweed and 55% to ryegrass. Microscopic analysis revealed ragweed, alternaria, cladosporium, honeysuckle (lonicera sp), privet shrub (ligustrum sp), and vetch (vicia sativa). CONCLUSIONS: An unknowingly sensitized atopic patient experienced an anaphylactic reaction after ingestion of a small quantity of bee pollen that contained pollens and fungi. Previously administered allergen immunotherapy that had reduced rhinitis symptoms did not prevent this allergic reaction.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 1
keywords = grass
(Clic here for more details about this article)

4/22. Allergy caused by ingestion of persimmon (diospyros kaki): detection of specific IgE and cross-reactivity to profilin and carbohydrate determinants.

    BACKGROUND: Allergy to persimmon (diospyros kaki) is very rare and not yet confirmed by means of double-blind, placebo-controlled, food-challenge (DBPCFC). Thus far, specific IgE to this fruit and cross-reactivity to pollen and other foods has not been determined. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to confirm allergy to persimmon in 3 patients with an according personal history and to characterize allergens and cross-reactivity of specific IgE antibodies to pollen and food allergens. One patient reacted with pruritus, penis edema, urticaria, and asthma; the second reacted with nausea and vomitus; and the third reacted with rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, and stomachache after ingestion of persimmon. methods: patients underwent skin prick testing with routine allergens, latex, persimmon, and other foods. Allergy to persimmon was confirmed by means of a DBPCFC. Specific serum IgE levels were measured with CAP-FEIA and the enzyme allergosorbent test (EAST) method. EAST and immunoblot inhibitions were carried out with persimmon; birch, grass, and ragweed pollen; latex; and N-glycans as inhibitors. RESULTS: All patients had positive skin test responses, DBPCFC and specific IgE assays to persimmon. Blot and EAST inhibition assays revealed IgE to cross-reactive profilin in one patient and IgE to cross-reacting carbohydrate determinants in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report on 3 cases of allergy to persimmon verified by means of DBPCFC and detection of specific IgE. The sensitization is due to cross-reactive profilin and carbohydrate determinants.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 1
keywords = grass
(Clic here for more details about this article)

5/22. Severe oral allergy syndrome and anaphylactic reactions caused by a Bet v 1- related PR-10 protein in soybean, SAM22.

    BACKGROUND: Anaphylactic reactions to soy products have been attributed to stable class 1 food allergens. OBJECTIVE: IgE- mediated reactions to a soy-containing dietary food product in patients allergic to birch pollen were investigated. methods: Detailed case histories were taken from 20 patients. Their sera were analyzed for IgE (UniCAP) specific for birch, grass, mugwort, the recombinant birch allergens rBet v 1 and rBet v2, and soy protein. Extracts from birch pollen, soy isolate, rBet v 1, and the recombinant PR-10 soy protein rSAM22 were coupled to paper disks or nitrocellulose for IgE measurements (enzyme allergosorbent test) or Western blot analysis. Enzyme allergosorbent testing, Western blot inhibition, and histamine release studies were performed with the same allergens. RESULTS: Most patients (17/20) experienced facial, oropharyngeal, and/or systemic allergic symptoms within 20 minutes after ingesting the soy product for the first time. Birch pollen allergy (16/20) was common, along with oral allergy syndrome to apple (12/20) or hazelnut (11/20). IgE levels to birch and Bet v 1 but not to other inhalants were high in 18 of 20 patients. Significant IgE binding to rSAM22 occurred in 17 of 20 patients. Blot experiments with the soy isolate revealed IgE-binding bands at 17 kd (15/20), 22 kd (1/20), and 35 to 38 kd (2/20); the former was inhibited by preincubation of the sera with rBet v 1 or rSAM22. Birch extract and soy isolate, rBet v 1, and rSAM22 induced dose-dependent histamine release in the nanomolar range. CONCLUSION: Immediate-type allergic symptoms in patients with birch pollen allergy after ingestion of soy protein-containing food items can result from cross-reactivity of Bet v 1 -specific IgE to homologous pathogenesis-related proteins, particularly the PR-10 protein SAM22.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 1
keywords = grass
(Clic here for more details about this article)

6/22. Oral allergy syndrome to fig.

    BACKGROUND: The few cases of food allergy to fig reported to date, whose main manifestations were anaphylactic reactions, have been related to a cross-sensitisation to weeping fig (ficus benjamina) or to the 'latex-fruit syndrome'. Here we report on two cases of the oral allergy syndrome (OAS) to fig in patients whose main allergic manifestations were related to sensitisation to grass and birch pollens. methods: The patients were characterised by clinical history, skin prick tests (SPT) with commercial and in-house extracts, prick-by-prick test, specific IgE measurements and challenge tests. PBS-soluble and insoluble extracts of both fig skin and pulp were examined for the presence of potential allergens by IgE immunoblotting. RESULTS: Both patients showed OAS followed by respiratory symptoms when challenged with fig. They were negative in both specific IgE detection and SPT with commercial extracts of fig and many other plant materials, including F. benjamina and hevea Brasiliensis, while grass and birch pollens gave positive results. Prick-by-prick tests and SPT with in-house extracts indicated that the fig skin had a much higher allergenicity than the pulp. Despite negative IgE detection by the CAP assay, immunoblotting experiments showed that potential fig allergens were PBS-soluble and present only in the skin of the fruit. CONCLUSIONS: OAS to fig followed by respiratory symptoms can be present in patients not sensitised to weeping fig or having the latex-fruit syndrome. Different parts of the fig can have different allergenicities, the most important allergens being proteins related to the skin of the fruit. Improved commercial fig extracts to be used for the diagnosis of this type of allergy have to be developed.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 2
keywords = grass
(Clic here for more details about this article)

7/22. Auriculotemporal nerve syndrome.

    INTRODUCTION: Auriculotemporal nerve syndrome is characterized by erythema, perspiration, heat and pain localized in the area supplied by the auriculotemporal nerve in response to gustatory stimuli after the ingestion of different types of food. This syndrome may be confused with food allergy. CASE REPORT: A 21-year-old woman complained of erythema, sweat and heat in the right cheek after intake of several foods such as chocolate, fruits, and nuts for the previous 8 months. She had fractured her jaw two years previously. methods: Skin prick tests were performed with a standard battery of common inhalant allergens and with an extensive panel of food allergens. Prick-by-prick tests were also performed with fruits, nuts, and cacao. Total and specific IgE were measured. Open oral food challenge test was performed. RESULTS: Skin prick tests were positive for grass and olive pollen. Prick-by-prick tests and specific IgE antibodies to the different foods were all negative. Open oral challenge test with apple reproduced the symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This benign syndrome is often misdiagnosed as a food allergy.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 1
keywords = grass
(Clic here for more details about this article)

8/22. anaphylaxis caused by cauliflower.

    BACKGROUND: Cauliflower is a vegetable belonging to the family Cruciferae, genus brassica, var. botrytis. methods: We report the case of a 70 year-old man who suffered an acute episode consisting of oropharyngeal itching, facial and hand swelling, dyspnea and severe bronchospasm within a few minutes after eating vegetable paella containing cauliflower, green beans, red and green pepper. Due to the severity of the reaction he needed treatment in the emergency room. RESULTS: Skin prick tests with common aeroallergens were positive to cupressus, Platanus and grass pollen. A strong skin prick test response was obtained with cauliflower and peach lipid transfer protein. Skin prick test with rice, green beans and pepper were negative. Specific IgE determinations were positive to cabbage and cauliflower, and negative to mustard. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical history and the results of the allergologic work-up point out to this patient having experienced an IgE-mediated anaphylactic reaction to cauliflower. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of anaphylaxis due to cauliflower.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 1
keywords = grass
(Clic here for more details about this article)

9/22. Lupine inhalation induced asthma in a child.

    The ingestion of lupine seed flour has been reported as a cause of allergic reactions. There is some evidence of its allergenic potential after inhalation. An 8-year-old asthmatic child, who was allergic to peanut, was studied in our clinic with the suspicion of an adverse drug reaction due to salbutamol. He suffered an asthma attack while playing with his brother, who had been eating lupine seed as snack; surprisingly, the asthma attack worsened with salbutamol. The skin tests showed a positive result with lupinus albus extract, peanut, garbanzo bean, navy bean, pea, green bean, lentil, soy, olea europea pollen, grass pollen and plantago lanceolata pollen. The prick-by-prick tests both from dried seeds and those preserved in salt and water were strongly positive. serum specific IgE antibodies were positive to Lupine albus (1.43 kU/l), peanut (4.32 kU/l), soy (2.15 kU/l), lentil (3.12 kU/l) and garbanzo (0.7 kU/l). After informed consent salbutamol was well tolerated but the patient had asthma in 5 min of manipulation of the lupine seeds. In our case, reactivity with other legumes was also demonstrated, but only peanut allergy was relevant because boiled legumes were tolerated. It is also notorious that anamnesis is so important to assess the true etiological agents of asthma.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 1
keywords = grass
(Clic here for more details about this article)

10/22. role of Dau c 1 in three different patterns of carrot-induced asthma.

    OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of Dau c 1 in three patients with carrot induced asthma. MATERIAL AND methods: Patient 1 had asthma when handling raw carrots. Sensitization to pollens wasn't detected. Patient 2 had rhinoconjunctivitis due to grass and olive pollen allergy. She had asthma when handling raw carrots. Patient 3 was diagnosed of rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma due to allergic sensitization to mites, several pollens and cat. She had asthma due to raw carrot ingestion and inhalation. IgE immunobot analysis and ELISA inhibition assay were used to investigate the allergens and specific antibodies. RESULTS: IgE Immunoblot Analysis: Dau c 1 from carrot extract and the recombinant rDau c 1 were recognized by IgE from patients 1 and 2. Band of Bet v 1 in birch pollen extract wasn't recognized. Patient 3 didn't recognize any of these allergens. Specific IgE to rDau c 1 was measured by ELISA. Specific IgE ELISA-inhibition with carrot as solid phase showed an intermediate inhibition (30 %) between carrot and rDau c 1 in patient 1; and a considerable inhibition (nearly 100 %) between carrot and rDau c 1 in patient 2. No inhibition was found in patient 3. Specific IgE ELISA inhibition between rDau c 1 and rBet v 1, employing rDau c 1 as solid phase was made in patients 1 and 2. Bet v 1 showed less than 40 % of inhibition of rDau c 1 in patient 1; and an intermediate inhibition (> 40 %) between rBet v 1 and rDau c 1 in patient 2. CONCLUSIONS: Airborne carrot allergens are able to sensitize without the implication of a previous pollen allergy. Dau c 1 was the main allergen in patient 2. In patient 1, there was a band of 30 kd that looks like the predominant allergen. patients 1 and 2 were sensitized directly from carrot allergens. In patient 3, Dau c 1 isn't related to the carrot allergy. Allergy to carrot in patient 3 seems to be related to her allergy to different pollens; however, it wasn't related to birch pollen. Mediterranean countries didn't show the same patterns of food-related pollen allergy than Nordic countries.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 1
keywords = grass
(Clic here for more details about this article)
| Next ->


Leave a message about 'Food Hypersensitivity'


We do not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content in this site. Click here for the full disclaimer.