Cases reported "Food Hypersensitivity"

Filter by keywords:



Filtering documents. Please wait...

1/28. A study on severe food reactions in sweden--is soy protein an underestimated cause of food anaphylaxis?

    BACKGROUND AND methods: Because of a fatal case of soy anaphylaxis occurring in sweden in 1992, a study was started the following year in which all physicians were asked to report fatal and life-threatening reactions caused by food. The results of the first 3 years of the study are reported here, including results from another ongoing study on deaths from asthma during the same period. RESULTS: In 1993-6, 61 cases of severe reactions to food were reported, five of them fatal. Peanut, soy, and tree nuts seemed to have caused 45 of the 61 reactions, and four of them were fatal. If two cases occurring less than a year before our study started are included, we are aware of two deaths caused by peanuts and four deaths caused by soy. All four youngsters who died from soy anaphylaxis with asthma were severely allergic to peanuts but had no previously known allergy to soy. In most cases, there was a rather symptom-free period for 30-90 min between early mild symptoms and severe and rapidly deteriorating asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Soy has probably been underestimated as a cause of food anaphylaxis. Those at risk seem to be young people with asthma and peanut allergy so severe that they notice symptoms after indirect contact.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 1
keywords = peanut
(Clic here for more details about this article)

2/28. Anaphylactic reaction to young garlic.

    BACKGROUND: garlic is well known to cause contact dermatitis and asthma. However, it is a very rare cause of food allergy. We present the case of a 23-year-old woman with previous history of allergy to pollen and dried fruit, and food-dependent, exercise-induced anaphylaxis for which no specific food could be identified as responsible, who experienced an anaphylactic reaction after eating young garlic. methods: skin prick tests and specific IgE immunoassay with several pollens and foods were performed, as well as the prick-prick test with young garlic and SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting IgE to young garlic and other liliaceae species, mustard, sesame, parsley, celery, hazelnut, almond, and pollen of birch and mugwort. RESULTS: skin prick tests and specific IgE were mainly positive for grass, plane tree, and mugwort pollen; peanut; hazelnut; walnut; almond; and mustard. Prick-prick tests with young garlic and garlic were positive. Total IgE was 113 U/ml. SDS-PAGE immunoblotting showed IgE-binding bands at 12 kDa to young garlic, garlic, onion, and leek extracts. Similar bands could also be detected with mugwort pollen and hazelnut extract. CONCLUSIONS: We describe IgE-mediated reaction to young garlic in a patient sensitized to pollen and dried fruit.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 0.33333333333333
keywords = peanut
(Clic here for more details about this article)

3/28. Lupine-induced anaphylaxis.

    BACKGROUND: Legumes are one of the most common foods causing allergic reactions in children and adults. Cross-reacting antibodies are frequently demonstrated in this family but the real clinical cross-reactivity is uncommon. OBJECTIVE: To report a case of lupine-induced anaphylaxis and to elucidate in vivo and in vitro cross-reactivity with some legumes. methods: skin prick test (SPT) with some legumes were performed. Cap-IgE, ELISA-IgE, and immunoblotting were carried out. Open oral challenges with some legumes were performed. Cross-reactivity was studied by ELISA and immunoblotting inhibition. RESULTS: The results demonstrated type-I hypersensitivity reactions with lupine and some other legumes. Cap-IgE with peanut was positive but the SPT and ELISA-IgE were negative and the patient tolerated a peanut challenge. ELISA inhibition revealed a partial inhibition (62%) using lupine as the solid phase. Partial inhibition was demonstrated by immunoblotting inhibition. Open oral challenge with peanut and green bean were negative but positive with pea. CONCLUSION: We present a lupine sensitized patient with positive SPT and in vitro cross-reactivity with other legumes. Clinical cross-reactivity progressively developed over a 5-year period. Discrepancies were found between the clinical aspect and in vitro study of peanut allergy. Factors determining the wide variability in cross-reactivity among individuals are still obscure.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 1.3333333333333
keywords = peanut
(Clic here for more details about this article)

4/28. Peanut allergy.

    Peanut allergy is acute and severe with symptoms of immediate hypersensitivity. This allergy is very common, affecting 1% of preschoolers. The incidence has increased with succeeding generations, and is possibly due to the increasing exposure of children to peanuts at a young age. diagnosis is via history, skin prick test, and serum IgE level. The mainstay of therapy is avoidance. Treatment of anaphylaxis includes epinephrine and antihistamines. Children usually will not outgrow this food allergy. Novel treatment with rush immunotherapy and enzyme-potentiated desensitization is not currently acceptable. We describe a 27-month-old Asian boy with a typical presentation of peanut hypersensitivity. A good understanding of the epidemiology of this illness is necessary for treatment and prevention.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 0.66666666666667
keywords = peanut
(Clic here for more details about this article)

5/28. Lethal or life-threatening allergic reactions to food.

    Fatal or life-threatening anaphylactic reactions to food occur in infants, children and adults. Atopic individuals with bronchial asthma and prior allergic reactions to the same food are at a particularly high risk, whereby even the mere inhalation of the allergenic food can be fatal. Not only peanuts, seafood and milk can induce severe, potentially lethal anaphylaxis, but indeed a wide spectrum of foods, according to the different patterns of food sensitivity in different countries. Foods with "hidden" allergens and meals at restaurants are particularly dangerous for patients with food allergies. Similarly, schools, public places and restaurants are the major places of risk. However, the main factor contributing to a fatal outcome is the fact that the victims did not carry their emergency kit with adrenaline (epinephrine) with them. In cases of death where food anaphylaxis is suspected, it is important for forensic reasons to preserve uneaten portions of the food in order to identify (hidden) allergens. It is also important to determine postmortem specific serum IgE, tryptase and histamine levels to document the anaphylaxis. There is a need to raise awareness of the diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis among doctors, those called upon to administer emergency medical care, and the public, and also to provide increased support for those with potentially fatal food allergies through the help of patients' organizations, and national and international medical societies. The food industry should ensure a policy of comprehensive labelling of ingredients so that even the smallest amount of potentially lethal foodstuffs can be clearly identified. Finally, the pharmaceutical industry should be persuaded to reintroduce an adrenaline inhaler onto the market.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 0.33333333333333
keywords = peanut
(Clic here for more details about this article)

6/28. A case of allergy to beer showing cross-reactivity between lipid transfer proteins.

    BACKGROUND: Lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) are highly conserved proteins present in a broad spectrum of fruits and vegetables that might represent a novel plant panallergen. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that LTP is an important allergen in beer and that beer LTP cross-reacts with LTP from botanically unrelated plant-derived foods. methods: serum from a patient with clinical allergy to both beer and rosaceae was studied for IgE reactivity to LTP to several vegetable foods by RAST, ELISA, immunoblot, and inhibition studies. RESULTS: Patient's serum showed a strong IgE reactivity to LTP purified from peach peel, carrot, and broccoli, and to a 10 kD protein in both apple and peach immunoblots, whereas no reactivity to birch cross-reactive allergens such as Bet v 1, profilin, or carbohydrates was found. In inhibition studies, preabsorption of serum with apple, walnut, hazelnut, peanut, corn, and rice caused a fall of 97%, 20%, 66%, 91%, 94%, and 93%, respectively, of its reactivity to peach LTP. beer RAST fell from 1.8 IU/mL to <0.1 IU/mL when a patient's serum was preabsorbed with recombinant carrot LTP. CONCLUSIONS: LTP is a relevant allergen in beer. beer LTP may cross-react with LTP from several other plant-derived foods.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 0.33333333333333
keywords = peanut
(Clic here for more details about this article)

7/28. True multifood allergy in a 4-year-old child: a case study.

    BACKGROUND: Food allergy is quite common in children, but it usually trends to improve with ageing. When an individual has specific IgE to a large variety of foods (multifood allergy) the clinical picture may be of remarkable severity and the avoidance of the offending foods may lead to severe dietary impairment.We describe a case of a child with ascertained multifood allergy. methods: The prick-by-prick testing with fresh foods and serum IgE tests were used to evaluate the patient's sensitivity to food allergens. The clinical effect of sensitizations were evaluated by DBPCFC which was carried out for egg, fish, peanuts, walnut, fig, asparagus, orange, chicory, medlar, peach, strawberry and cherry. Each challenge was performed on a separate day. medical assistance and resuscitation facilities were available during the whole challenge procedures. RESULTS: SPT with fresh food gave a 4 mm wheal for fig, asparagus, cherry and walnut; a 5 mm wheal for medlar and orange; a 6 mm wheal for chicory and strawberry; a 7 mm wheal for fish and peanuts; an 8 mm wheal for peach and a 9 mm wheal for egg. The RAST assay confirmed the presence of specific IgE to egg, fish, peanuts, walnut, fig, orange, strawberry, peach, and cherry. The total serum IgE was 730,6 kU/l.The DBPCFC was positive, at various degrees, for all foods tested according to skin sensitizations. CONCLUSIONS: The case herein described is a true multifood allergy, as confirmed by the DBPCFC. Multifood allergy is not common, but when present it can lead to severe dietary limitation.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 1
keywords = peanut
(Clic here for more details about this article)

8/28. Detection of allergy to nuts by the radioallergosorbent test.

    The diagnosis of food allergy is often difficult to make by conventional means. Histories are frequently ambiguous, and skin testing is of dubious reliability because of the number of false-positive and false-negative reactions. We have evaluated the radioallergosorbent test (RAST) for the in vitro measurement of the specific IgE antibodies to nuts, including brazil nut, almond, walnut, pecan, cashew, and the legume, peanut. Serums were obtained from 18 patients with a history of nut allergy and IgE level and specific IgE antibodies were measured. Thirteen of the 18 patients had significantly elevated IgE antibody (greater than twice control) to one or more of the allergens. Prausnitz-Kustner tests on selected serums in general corroborated the results of the in vitro studies. Five patients had RAST elevations to 2 or more nuts. As a group RAST-positive patients had elevated mean serum IgE levels and more severe clinical symptoms (p less than 0.01). The specificity and cross-reactivity of IgE antibodies to different nut antigens was investigated by RAST inhibition with serums from 5 patients having high levels of IgE antibody. In 4 patients no cross-reactivity between brazil nut and peanut was found. In contrast, several nut extracts inhibited the reaction of pecan allergen with IgE antibodies. These results indicate that specific IgE antibodies can be measured by RAST in patients with nut allergy and the cross-reactivity of nut antigens can be investigated. RAST would appear to be most useful in confirming the diagnosis of nut hypersensitivity in children or in highly allergic patients in whom skin testing poses a risk of anaphylaxis.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 0.66666666666667
keywords = peanut
(Clic here for more details about this article)

9/28. Hidden fish substance triggers allergy.

    Food allergy (hypersensitivity) is a form of adverse food reaction caused by an immunological response to a particular food. IgE-mediated food allergy is responsible for most immediate-type food-induced hypersensitivity reactions. The prevalence of food allergy in the general population, not including oral allergy syndrome, is about 1-2%. While adults might tend to be allergic to fish, crustaceans, peanuts, and tree nuts, children, on the other hand, tend to be allergic to cow's milk, egg white, wheat, and soy. Food is the most common eliciting factor of anaphylaxis (45%), followed by drugs (29%), and insect stings (21%). Our study describes a 3 1/2-year-old boy who is allergic to fish consumed via ingestion and inhalation. This case is a good example of how easily people with food allergies can unintentionally consume foods to which they allergic, and is a clear demonstration of the dangers of such effects.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 0.33333333333333
keywords = peanut
(Clic here for more details about this article)

10/28. Rice-induced enterocolitis in an infant: TH1/TH2 cellular hypersensitivity and absent IgE reactivity.

    BACKGROUND: Although food allergy is common in children, rice allergy is unusual in Western cultures. OBJECTIVE: To report a case of T-cell-mediated rice intolerance in an 11-month-old girl. methods: To evaluate the intolerance to rice in this patient, a graded rice food challenge was performed. To examine the immunologic reactivity to rice, in vitro lymphoproliferative responses and cytokine synthesis of rice-stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) was performed. Subsequently, skin patch testing to rice and other foods was performed. RESULTS: Allergy skin prick test results were negative for rice and positive for egg, milk, and soy. Specific IgE antibodies to rice, egg, peanut, wheat, walnut, codfish, milk, soybean, corn, shrimp, scallops, and clams were undetectable. Results of a single-blind rice food challenge were positive, manifested by emesis that persisted for more than an hour and required intravenous hydration. in vitro lymphoproliferation by the patient's PBLs to rice stimulation was positive. In addition, cytokine synthesis of interferon-gamma, interleukin 10 (IL-10), tumor necrosis factor a, and IL-5 by the patient's rice-stimulated PBLs was elevated, indicating a TH1/TH2 cell response to rice. endoscopy revealed normal esophageal, gastric, and duodenal mucosa; a biopsy specimen revealed mild esophagitis. Duodenal explant T cells were initially established by stimulation with rice and IL-2. After a 2-day rest, the lymphocytes were restimulated with rice for 7 days and revealed increased interferon-gamma and IL-5 synthesis. Twenty billion colony forming units of lactobacillus GG were added to the patient's diet twice daily. After 6 weeks, rice rechallenge resulted in emesis within 1 hour. Results of patch testing were positive to rice, wheat, and barley but negative to soy, which the patient tolerated on food challenge. CONCLUSIONS: Although this patient did not demonstrate IgE antibody to rice, TH1/TH2 cell-mediated responses to rice were detected, and the patient experienced significant morbidity. Patch testing for gastrointestinal food allergies may be useful when the food specific IgE antibody is negative. Probiotic therapy in this patient did not ameliorate her sensitivity to rice, and food elimination remains the only reliable treatment for TH1/TH2-mediated food hypersensitivity.
- - - - - - - - - -
ranking = 0.33333333333333
keywords = peanut
(Clic here for more details about this article)
| Next ->


Leave a message about 'Food Hypersensitivity'


We do not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content in this site. Click here for the full disclaimer.