1/13. Endoscopically assisted anterior cranial skull base resection of sinonasal tumors.The traditional approach to sinonasal tumors involving the base of skull has been the anterior craniofacial resection. Endoscopic techniques have created the potential to approach the intranasal aspect of skull base lesions without external incisions and still develop an en bloc resection when removed. We report our initial experience with skull base neoplasms in which the otolaryngic portion of the standard resection was accomplished instead through an endoscopic approach. The nature of lesions favorable for this approach and associated technical issues are discussed. Although we do not consider this approach a replacement for the traditional anterior craniofacial resection, it is an important adjunct in the skull base surgeon's armamentarium.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 1keywords = craniofacial (Clic here for more details about this article) |
2/13. Surgical treatment of a massive chondrosarcoma in the skull base associated with Maffucci's syndrome: a case report.BACKGROUND: A successfully treated massive chondrosarcoma in the skull base associated with Maffucci's syndrome is presented. The purpose of this report is to discuss the surgical approach to the tumor and reconstruction of the skull base. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 36-year-old woman who had a history of multiple enchondromas and subcutaneous hemangiomas presented with decreased right visual acuity and left papilledema. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a mass in the skull base. The tumor occupied the nasal and paranasal cavities, and extended to the anterior, middle, and posterior intracranial spaces. The midline skull base structures and the left middle cranial base were destroyed. Using a combined anterior craniofacial and left orbitozygomatic approach, the tumor was totally resected. The large skull base defect was reconstructed with a vascularized outer table parietal bone graft attached to a bipedicled temporoparietal galeal flap. The postoperative course was uneventful except for decreased left visual acuity, and temporary diplopia and facial hypesthesia. In 40 months of follow-up there was no recurrence.CONCLUSIONSA skull base approach should be selected to perform total resection of an extensive skull base tumor. The bipedicled temporoparietal galeal flap and vascularized calvarial bone was useful for simultaneous reconstruction.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.5keywords = craniofacial (Clic here for more details about this article) |
3/13. Zones of approach for craniofacial resection: minimizing facial incisions for resection of anterior cranial base and paranasal sinus tumors.OBJECTIVE: Anterior cranial base tumors are surgically resected with combined craniofacial approaches that frequently involve disfiguring facial incisions and facial osteotomies. The authors outline three operative zones of the anterior cranial base and paranasal sinuses in which tumors can be resected with three standard surgical approaches that minimize transfacial incisions and extensive facial osteotomies. methods: The zones were defined by performing dissections on 10 cadaveric heads and by evaluating radiographic images of patients with anterior cranial base tumors. The three approaches performed on each cadaver were transbasal, transmaxillary, and extended transsphenoidal. RESULTS: Three zones of approach were defined for accessing tumors of the anterior cranial base, nasal cavity, and paranasal sinuses. Zone 1 is exposed by the transbasal approach, which is limited anteriorly by the supraorbital rim, posteriorly by the optic chiasm and clivus, inferiorly by the palate, and laterally by the medial orbital walls. This approach allows access to the entire anterior cranial base, nasal cavity, and the majority of maxillary sinuses. The limitation imposed by the orbits results in a blind spot in the superolateral extent of the maxillary sinus. Zone 2 is exposed by a sublabial maxillotomy approach and accesses the entire maxillary sinus, including the superolateral blind spot and the ipsilateral anterior cavernous sinus. However, access to the anterior cranial base is limited. Zone 3 is exposed by the transsphenoidal approach. This approach accesses the midline structures but is limited by the lateral nasal walls and intracavernous carotid arteries. An extended transsphenoidal approach allows further exposure to the anterior cranial base, clivus, or cavernous sinuses. The use of the endoscope facilitates tumor resection in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. CONCLUSION: The operative zones outlined offer minimally invasive craniofacial approaches to accessing lesions of the anterior cranial base and paranasal sinuses, obviating facial incisions and facial osteotomies. Case illustrations demonstrating the approach selection paradigm are presented.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 3keywords = craniofacial (Clic here for more details about this article) |
4/13. Surgical strategies in the removal of malignant tumors and benign lesions of the anterior skull base.The choice of surgical approaches to the tumors of the anterior skull base is determined by the location, dimensions of such lesions and their relations to the surrounding structures. Furthermore, the need for the reconstruction of the dura and skull base structures has an important influence on the decision about the surgical procedure. Transfacial approaches provide limited exposure, especially when tumors damage the floor of the anterior cranial fossa and involve the frontobasal dura and brain. Transcranial, craniofacial and subcranial approaches in particular may aid a surgeon in the removal of such lesions, and often these surgical procedures are the only beneficial methods. Our study comprised 15 patients. Transcranial approaches were used in ten cases. In five further cases, we adopted craniofacial or subcranial approaches. Total removal of these lesions was possible in 13 cases. Neither important complications nor death after surgery was observed except for two cases (craniofacial/subcranial approach) where the CSF leak and CNS infection were reported. We deem that the transcranial approach creates a good possibility for total removal of anterior skull base tumors, particularly of the benign lesions, and permits reconstruction of the skull base damaged by the tumor. However, in patients with large malignant tumors, the en bloc resection via the combined craniofacial/subcranial approach achieved better outcome.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 2keywords = craniofacial (Clic here for more details about this article) |
5/13. Hemifacial dismasking flap for anterior skull base tumor--technical note.A new approach to malignant tumor in the anterior skull base using a hemifacial dismasking flap is described. A bicoronal incision is extended unilaterally down to the neck, degloving the craniofacial tissue to widely expose the skeleton underneath, allowing easy resection of an extensive tumor without postoperative scarring of the face. This method has been used successfully on five patients.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.5keywords = craniofacial (Clic here for more details about this article) |
6/13. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma in anterior skull base: case report.We report the case of a 16-year-old boy who presented with mesenchymal chondrosarcoma involving the ethmoid sinus, right orbit, nasal cavity, and anterior cranial fossa. The tumor was totally resected by craniofacial surgery; the patient's postoperative course was uneventful. Microscopically, the tumor was composed of highly cellular undifferentiated small cells, alternating with zones of cartilaginous tissues. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma is a rare, aggressive variant of chondrosarcoma, which might be encountered more frequently due to the advances in neuroimaging and surgical procedures.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.5keywords = craniofacial (Clic here for more details about this article) |
7/13. The surgical management of osseous cranial base tumours in children.BACKGROUND: Osseous cranial base tumours in children present as a diverse collection of both benign and malignant pathologies. Concerns raised by the difficulty in accurate diagnosis and local recurrence of benign lesions and by the long-term sequelae of radiotherapy for malignant cranial tumours (marked local growth disturbances, pituitary dysfunction, visual disturbances, late new tumour induction) prompted an evaluation of surgical resection of cranial base tumours in children, with specific regard to safety, efficacy and aesthetic result. methods: A retrospective review was performed of 10 consecutive children presenting with tumours either arising from or eroding into bone of the cranial base who were managed by surgical resection in a 10-year period from 1986 to 1996. The patients demonstrated a great variation in both presentation and pathology. All underwent surgical resection of tumour with reconstruction where indicated. RESULTS: There were no postoperative complications or mortality. All patients remained clinically free of disease at follow-up, which ranged from 17 months to 9 years (mean 6 years and 4 months). CONCLUSION: The aggressive surgical resection and craniofacial reconstruction of cranial base tumours in the paediatric population offers a safe and efficacious mode of treatment that obviates problems of diagnosis and local recurrence for benign lesions and of the long-term sequelae of radiotherapy for malignant lesions.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.5keywords = craniofacial (Clic here for more details about this article) |
8/13. Use of vertical median forehead flap in the reconstruction of the anterior skull base: report of two cases.Improvements in reconstruction of the skull base have made craniofacial surgery safe. Reconstruction of the anterior skull base must provide a seal between the cranial cavity and upper respiratory tract, as well as offer structural support for the brain. A wide variety of local flaps have been designed. The choice of flap in individual cases depends on the location and size of the defect. We report a reconstructive technique for the anterior skull base with vertical median forehead flaps which we used to treat two patients, one patient with adenocarcinoma and the other with leiomyosarcoma. Both were lesions of the ethmoid sinuses and nasal cavity.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.5keywords = craniofacial (Clic here for more details about this article) |
9/13. Indications for, contraindications to, and interruption of craniofacial procedures.In spite of increasing experience with skull base surgery, some of the guidelines for indications for operations may vary according to the institution. One-hundred two patients underwent craniofacial oncologic resections at our institution from 1982 to 1995. A retrospective analysis of the indications for and contraindications to these procedures was undertaken. The main indications for malignant tumors were skin lesions with direct invasion of the anterior or lateral skull base (69%) and nasal-paranasal sinus tumors (21%). The main indications for benign tumors were glomus lesions (26%), menigiomas (22%), and fibro-osseous lesions of the anterior skull base (19%). The main contraindications were extensive invasion of the central nervous system, invasion of the cavernous sinus and/or internal carotid artery by aggressive malignancies, and bilateral orbital invasion in a nonblind patient. Also, 6 patients had their procedures interrupted during craniotomy for several reasons - extensive central nervous system invasion (2 cases), bilateral orbital invasion (1), lack of brain retraction (1), lack of histologic diagnosis during the operation (1), and purulent discharge at the frontal sinus (1). Craniofacial oncologic operations are extensive surgical procedures that have to be properly indicated in order to obtain low levels of morbidity and mortality. The selection of cases is of paramount importance. In some instances, it seems advisable even to interrupt these operations in the first phase.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 2.5keywords = craniofacial (Clic here for more details about this article) |
10/13. Successful excision of a large immature teratoma involving the cranial base: report of a case with long-term follow-up.OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: Massive congenital intracranial teratomas with extracranial extension are rare. The prognosis in these cases has been poor, with stillbirth or immediate postpartum death as the usual outcome. With recent advances in fetal monitoring, neonatal care, and surgical techniques used for the management of complex tumors of the cranial base, some of these lesions may now be amenable to radical surgical resection and then immediate craniofacial reconstruction. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A neonate with a large congenital immature teratoma involving the entire left side of the cranium and face was evaluated at our institution 1 day after birth. INTERVENTION: Total resection of the mass and then immediate reconstruction of the deformed orbit, maxilla, and mandible were performed at 9 days of age. Additional operations on the midface and mandible to allow for a functional bite were subsequently required as the child developed during the next 2 years. Four years after resection, the patient exhibited a reasonable cosmetic result and only mild developmental delay. CONCLUSION: We conclude that acceptable functional and cosmetic outcomes can be achieved by early intervention, consisting of radical resection and immediate craniofacial reconstruction, in some neonates with massive congenital craniofacial teratomas.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 1.5keywords = craniofacial (Clic here for more details about this article) |
| | Next -> |