1/27. Listeners who prefer monaural to binaural hearing aids.Four patients who preferred monaural as compared with binaural amplification were evaluated. For these patients, audiometric data, recognition performance on a dichotic digit task, and monaural and binaural hearing aid performance using four amplification strategies (National Acoustic laboratories-Revised, a speech in noise algorithm, multiple-microphone arrays, and frequency modulated [FM]) are described.The results of dichotic testing using a one-, two-, and three-pair dichotic digit task in free- and directed-recall conditions indicated a left-ear deficit for all subjects that could not be explained by peripheral auditory findings or by a cognitive-based deficit. The results of soundfield testing using a speech in multitalker babble paradigm indicated that when listening in noise, there was little difference between aided and unaided word-recognition performance, suggesting that the binaural hearing aids originally fit for each patient were not providing substantial benefit when listening in a competing babble background. Word-recognition performance when aided monaurally in the right ear was superior to performance when aided monaurally in the left ear and when aided binaurally. The only successful binaural amplification strategy was the FM system. The results indicate that listeners with an auditory-based deficit in dichotic listening may function better with a monaural hearing aid fitting or with an assistive listening device such as an FM system. The findings also suggest that a test of dichotic listening is an important component in the evaluation of patients being considered for amplification.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 1keywords = speech (Clic here for more details about this article) |
2/27. Improvement of chronic hearing loss after shunt revision. A case report.BACKGROUND: hearing loss after intracranial and spinal procedures involving cerebrospinal fluid loss is rarely reported in the literature. We report a patient who suffered from delayed hearing loss after cerebrospinal fluid shunting that improved after revising the shunt to a higher-pressure valve. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 32-year-old woman presented with bilateral hearing loss 4 years after ventriculoperitoneal shunting for communicating hydrocephalus. Her otologic work-up revealed sensorineural hearing loss. In an attempt to improve her hearing, 6 years after the hearing loss began (10 years after the shunt was placed), she underwent a shunt revision in which her valve was changed to a higher-pressure device. After the procedure, she had a significant improvement in her speech discrimination and a mild improvement in her pure tone recognition. These changes were documented with serial audiograms. CONCLUSION: hearing loss after cerebrospinal shunting procedures is not always limited to the immediate postoperative period. It may be a late complication of cerebrospinal fluid diversion. Chronic hearing loss after ventriculoperitoneal shunting may be treatable by changing the valve to a higher-pressure device. The etiology of hearing loss from intracranial hypotension is briefly discussed.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 46.080231443004keywords = speech discrimination, discrimination, speech (Clic here for more details about this article) |
3/27. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children.AIMS: to determine the benefit of bilateral cochlear implantation in a child on speech and language development. METHOD: This child got her first implant, a Nucleus 24-system, on the right side at the age of 2.5 years. The left side was implanted at the age of 4.4 years with a Nucleus 24Contour-system. On the right side she's now wearing an Esprit 24-speechprocessor (SPR). On the left side she has a Sprint-SPR. M. goes to a mainstream school and receives Speech and language therapy in a Speech and Hearing Rehab Centre. The etiology of her deafness was hyperbilirubinemia. Auditory capacity and speech recognition tests were performed for both ears separately and together. RESULTS: Aided thresholds give a PTA of 28 dBA with the first implant, 22 dBA with the second implant and with both implants we get a PTA of 23 dBA. Results for speech identification and recognition demonstrated an increased performance when both implants are used together. Speech and language development was equivalent to the mean of age 4.5. At the time of testing M. was 4.8 years. At this time the speech and language development show no delays with normal hearing children. CONCLUSIONS: bilateral cochlear implantation in children may have additional value for their speech and language development. Also, implantation may be considered when auditory neuropathy is likely.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 3keywords = speech (Clic here for more details about this article) |
4/27. Bilateral amplification for the elderly: are two aids better than one?This paper reviews the advantages and disadvantages of bilateral amplification as opposed to unilateral hearing use for older persons with bilateral symmetric hearing loss. Binaural advantages, such as improved localization and speech recognition in noise, are presented as they pertain to the older population. In addition, contraindications, such as binaural interference, increased costs, cosmetic concerns, decreased manipulation skills, and additional hearing aid management issues, are discussed. A case study is provided in which unilateral hearing aid fitting was more beneficial to a patient than two hearing aids. It is concluded that bilateral amplification should be attempted for all elderly patients with symmetric hearing loss, unless a contraindication is suspected.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.5keywords = speech (Clic here for more details about this article) |
5/27. hearing loss after direct blunt neck trauma.OBJECTIVE: To report for the first time hearing impairment resulting from blunt neck trauma. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of clinical, pure tone, and speech audiometric findings. The first obtained within 3 months and the follow-up ones between 6 and 12 months after injury. Three representative examples are given. patients: Eighty-three patients (166 ears) who reported hearing impairment after blunt neck trauma. RESULTS: Twenty of the 166 ears (12%) had normal hearing and 137 ears (81.3%) showed an acoustic trauma-like hearing impairment. Eight ears (4.8%) had a hearing loss of at least 30 dB in the speech frequencies (500-2,000 Hz) and two ears (1.2%) had additional impairment in the higher frequencies. Only one ear (0.8%) had a conductive hearing loss. No speech discrimination score was poorer than 80%. Forty-six subjects (55.4%) reported tinnitus. CONCLUSIONS: Blunt neck trauma, like whiplash injury, may cause objectively measurable hearing impairment.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 47.080231443004keywords = speech discrimination, discrimination, speech (Clic here for more details about this article) |
6/27. Transient musical hallucinosis of central origin: a review and clinical study.A 52 year old, right handed, hearing impaired woman was admitted with headache and neck stiffness. The only neuropsychological symptom was transient auditory perceptions in the left ear, which were musical, seemed familiar and were not influenced by verbal communication. CT and MRI showed a right subarachnoid haemorrhage, while brainstem auditory evoked potentials failed to reveal a brainstem lesion. In patients with organic cerebral disease, unilateral auditory hallucinations (AHs) may indicate a lesion in the contralateral hemisphere. However, according to this review the type of AHs (verbal versus musical) is not consistently associated with a cerebral lesion on either side.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.26433267690916keywords = perception (Clic here for more details about this article) |
7/27. ENT management of a child with CHARGE association.The acronym CHARGE is used to describe specific congenital birth defects in children: colobomata, heart defect, atresia of the choanae, retarded growth or development, genital hypoplasia, and ear anomalies or deafness. CHARGE association with hearing impairment is a challenge to ENT surgeons. We report the case of a child with CHARGE association who underwent cochlear implantation using an unconventional surgical approach and review the postoperative speech perception results. The benefits of cochlear implantation in children with multiple congenital defects are discussed.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 224.14483153708keywords = speech perception, speech, perception (Clic here for more details about this article) |
8/27. Trade-offs between better hearing and better cosmetics.A case study is reported of an adult bilateral cochlear implant patient who owns both a pair of ear-level and body-worn speech processors and chooses to wear them in unique configurations, knowingly compromising his auditory performance. The aim was to determine if differences in hearing could be quantified between these devices and to examine the size of these effects that would lend themselves to trading between performance and cosmetics. The patient reported wearing bilateral ear-level speech processors (programmed with the Cochlear Corporation spectral PEAK [SPEAK] coding strategy) 75% of the time for cosmetic and convenience reasons even though he "heard the best" with bilateral body-worn speech processors (programmed with the Cochlear Corporation advanced combination encoder strategy [ACE]). speech perception and localization tests confirmed that this patient performed significantly better on monosyllabic phonemes in quiet (a difference from 60% to 75%) and localization (a total root-mean-squared-error difference from 22 degrees to 12degrees ) with bilateral body-worn speech processors and consistently rated various speech sounds as more clear than with bilateral ear-level units. There was a 2-dB difference in sentence reception threshold in noise, which was not statistically significant. These results suggest that clinicians should consider and provide options to patients when there are trade-offs to be made regarding understanding performance and cosmetics. Some individuals may choose better speech perception over cosmetics, and the ability to choose might result in greater compliance. The observations made here are relevant to hearing aid users as well.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 226.90916421399keywords = speech perception, speech, perception (Clic here for more details about this article) |
9/27. The BAHA Softband. A new treatment for young children with bilateral congenital aural atresia.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of a bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) Softband (fitted unilaterally and bilaterally) in young children with bilateral congenital aural atresia. SUBJECTS: Two children with severe bilateral congenital conductive hearing loss, who had been fitted with a transcutaneous BAHA Softband at the age of 3 and 28 months, respectively. The latter child had been fitted with a conventional bone-conduction hearing aid at the age of 3 months; at 28 months, this child had received the BAHA Softband and after 5 months of unilateral application, the BAHA Softband was fitted bilaterally. Follow-up in the two children was 31 and 17 months, respectively. methods: Using the artificial mastoid, gain and maximum output were studied in this new transcutaneous application of the BAHA, with the BAHA Classic and the BAHA Compact as sound processor. Results were compared to those obtained with a conventional bone-conduction device (Oticon E 300 P). Aided thresholds and sound lateralization scores were assessed with double visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA). To test the validity of the BAHA Softband, the speech and language development of the children was assessed by means of age-appropriate tests (the preverbal Symbolic play test and the Dutch non-speech test for receptive and expressive language and the Dutch version of the Reynell language test). RESULTS: The electro-acoustic measurements showed minor differences in gain between the three devices. At a reduced volume setting, the mean input level at which the output levelled off was largely comparable between the BAHA Classic and the conventional device, but somewhat poorer with the BAHA Compact. Both children showed speech and language development that was in accordance with their cognitive development. CONCLUSIONS: The BAHA Softband was a valid intervention in children with congenital bilateral aural atresia who were too young for percutaneous BAHA application.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 1.5keywords = speech (Clic here for more details about this article) |
10/27. Large vestibular aqueduct syndrome: a case study.A 23-month-old female was referred for hearing aid fitting after failing newborn hearing screening and being diagnosed with significant hearing loss through subsequent diagnostic testing. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) and behavioral testing revealed a moderate-to-severe bilateral mixed hearing loss. Prior to the hearing aid evaluation, tympanostomy tubes had been placed bilaterally with little or no apparent change in hearing sensitivity. Initial testing during the hearing aid fitting confirmed earlier findings, but abnormal middle ear results were observed, requiring referral for additional otologic management. Following medical clearance, binaural digital programmable hearing aids were fit using Desired sensation Level parameters. Behavioral testing and probe microphone measures showed significant improvements in audibility. Decrease in hearing sensitivity was observed six months following hearing aid fitting. Radiological studies, ordered due to the mixed component and decreased hearing sensitivity, revealed large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS). Based on the diagnosis of LVAS, a cochlear implant was placed on the right ear; almost immediate speech-language gains were observed.- - - - - - - - - - ranking = 0.5keywords = speech (Clic here for more details about this article) |
| | Next -> |